fomapan 400 vs hp5

[], [] of a film camera as well as film itself, and this meant that my results were not ideal. Thank you Victor! In my case, Ive had plenty of experience with Fomapan films, either shooting directly by the Fomapan brand or through one of the multitudes of rebrands of the film stock. Filling the Gap Photography & Mental Health. Ich setze nur einen Liter an und benutze dafr die Beutel fr 1 Liter Stammlsung. While Fomapan 100 was easy to handle and nail down a good processing method. Easy to introduce texture in those areas in a print just by flashing the paper beforehand, if that is something that perticularly worried anyone who doesnt want any areas of pure white on their image. Black and rich and whites are vivid. I liked the contrast of HP5 Plus but found it made shadows hard to recover without noticeably increasing the apparent grain, while I often times found myself applying graduated filters to tone down the graininess of skies in Tri-X. However due to my slow shooting style I didnt have these images ready in any kind of timeframe that would make sense, and have since shot a number of rolls of both, which has given me a little more to talk about. You write from your shoes on the groundand no tree shots. Unless I pre-soak and rinse the film before the developer, I do so thoroughly after dumping-off the developer to ensure that none of the vivid green anti-halation dye remains to avoid polluting my stop both with it; with that level of rinse, the stop is probably redundant, but I do it anyway. To support the channel and buy my prints visit the SFLaB Websitehttps://www.rogerlowe.co.ukWant more content?Why not become a member! Ich bin immer etwas unsicher welche Entwicklungszeiten ich nehmen soll, da ja nie klar ist um welche Version des Filmes es sich handelt. Der 100/21 Silvermax in Silvermax Entwickler entspricht genau dem was ich suchte. Fantastic review!Thank you for sharing these shots and your thoughts and observations. Kentmere is a low contrast film which leaves you a lot of room to work in the shadows, and turns out great when developed in DD-X. Especially considering the cost Id be happy to shoot this when the light calls for it, and keep my standard Delta and HP5 for the less than ideal autumn and winer light. du hast freie Wahl: - mit Rodinal 1+50 fr gute Empfindlichkeitsausnutzung bis 640 ASA, Schrfe und normale Kontraste, (aber mitunter lange Entwicklugszeiten, die beim Agfakipprhythmus anstrengend werden), - mit Rodinal 1+100 fr hnlich gute Ergebnisse bei weiger Bewegungsarbeit fr den Arm in der (semi-)Standentwicklungund sparsamerer Ausnutzung der chemie, - mit Atomal49 fr schne Grauwerte aber nur bis 320 ASA und etwas weniger scharf, dafr weicheres Korn, - mit D76 fr Nennempfindlichkeit und etwas krzere Entwicklugnszeiten, - mit Rodinal 1+25 um den 60er-Jahre Zeitungsfoto-vintagelook mit ordentlich Korn und knackigen Kontrasten wiederzubeleben. It works well in Rollei Low-Speed, Adox FX-39 II, Kodak D-96, Adox Atomal 49, etc. The datasheets say that at 2, you should go with a 6 exposure. I cant find a reputable source to this, and theres nothing mentioned in Fomas technical sheets, so Im really not sure what to think about this. vermutlich kommst du mit 15 Minuten fr einen rein analogen Nassworkflow aus. Enter ? Im Schrank lagern noch zwei ungeffnete Pulverstze fr D 76 bzw. If you prefer yourself, it is possibble to give formula? Having now revisited it with my more advanced skillset Im happy with the look it can offer, and have a better []. In their world, it was imperative to get the shot (a few were still using 45 press cameras) so each step of the process carried equal weight: exposure, developing, printing. Although I wouldnt Also, I will not be doing anything I consider to be "my work." Fomapan is a film I tried when I first started out, but I was undertaking the learning curve of a film camera as well as film itself, and this meant that my results were not ideal. The same can be said for HP5 Plus. Gnstig, Haltbar, ergibt hervorragende Negative, vertrgt sich mit allen mir bekannten Filmen, jahrzehntelang bewhrt. Wenn ich mich fr nur einen Entwickler entscheiden mte: D76. Push Fomapan 400. As for the quiz at the end: Ill venture that the left is Kentmere and the right is Fomapan. This allows me to worry less about temperature, and I sort of just let things sort themselves out in the tank with as little agitation as necessary. I want to ask a question about developer; What kind of developer was used? To learn more, check-out the About page, or read News for the latest. I dont think I have as direct an analogy with Fomapan 400, its more of its own thing. If excessive grain is not disturbing you for the Fomapan 400 you can go for Rodinal. Again, much of that comes down to personal taste, and what you want from your photographs. Thank you! Re: Fomapan 100, 200 and 400. Out of all the films I tested, I felt Tri-X had the best balance of contrast overall. Fomapan gives a high contrast result in most situations, including even/overcast light. The Kentmere also shows a little halation, but only when the light is very concentrated and higher than a few stops from what Im exposing for. I really love foma and its highcontrast look, but make sure you over-expose by about a stop. Fomapan 400 does well with Fomadon LQN and pretty good with HC-110 in my experience. Ganz okay der Laden by Christoph Schrief, on Flickr. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. I've managed to tame it a bit with homemade Microdol 1:3 BTW Although development is slow, like 25-30 minutes at 75F with 30 second agitation. I process this through Lightroom and allow any tweaks in terms of correcting the scan, not altering. Kentmere 400 feels like Tri-X with less dynamic range. M3+50er Elmar auf Silvermax. ob es der neue oder der alte APX400 war? I ask because my 30.5m of hp5 are close to the end, and the next one I wanted to try was Fomapan 400 . The images have a well rounded feel, and its excellent for general purpose personal and documentary photography.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-2','ezslot_19',189,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-2-0'); The Fomapan suffers at 400, with a blockier rendering, and a foggy grey tone in the blacks which somewhat spoils the aesthetic, unless thats something youre especially looking for. for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers; Press?? Fomapan 400 is a black and white negative film that has a very unique look. Trying to choose between black and white films can often feel like trying to understand the difference between cappuccino, latte or a flat white. There is no longer that very obvious and annoying halation or muddiness in the prints. je nach Charge musste mal um ne Minute variiert werden, das wars dann aber auch. I am presently shooting Fomapan 200 in my 45. Ich mchte einen klassischen Film verwenden, die Tmax und Deltas fallen also raus. They werent having any of that artsy stuff. end of the spectrum compared to Ilford and Kodak offerings, but also because I think it performs better than its price point. Ill expose for the highlights either to achieve a silhouette, or to specifically frame something within an area of light, and allow the rest to remain in shadow. All negatives were scanned on a Nikon D810 with the 60mm f/2.8 AF-S macro lens and a Nikon ES-2 adapter, which is a massive leap forward in quality from the V600 I used when I first started shooting film. Fibonawak 8 mo. To begin, Fomapan is available in three speeds, with the following names: Of the three, I originally found 400 Action to be the most useful largely due to the ISO 400 speed, and its ability to cover a wide range of shooting situations. I buy all of my film from Analogue Wonderland.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_11',181,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-4-0'); For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. Ill meter Fomapan 400 for the shadows when I think theres maybe a three-four stop difference between shadow and highlight, any higher and Ill expose slightly further up. Now that Im retired, I like instant gratification slip into the darkroom whenever I need to process filmpour, dilute, temp check, time/temp compensate and process. If I wanted that I'd use a softar filter. Character is quite a subjective measurement, and different people will assess different qualities when discussing it. weil rodinal von AGFA ist. I decided to give Fomapan 400 a try after discovering that it is exactly the same price as Kentmere 400. But in all instances I shot at ISO320. Thanks John! Sort: Order Added Price: lowest first Price: highest first Brand: A - Z Brand: Z - A Top Rated Clear All Thank you Daniel! "Never criticize someone until you've walked a mile in their shoes. If you enjoyed my work here you can find more of it over on my Instagram. 21 Grad, 19 Minuten AGFA in R1+50 haben bei mir 640 ASA gebracht. If youre looking for something a little different or want a bit of a challenge and a change from the near-perfection of Ilford and Kodak films, give Fomapan 400 a try, you never know. It will also mean that I can make a few comparisons to other, higher end 400 speed films, as they fill roughly the same space. Clear editor. But dont limit yourself to those; it also sings in Kodak D-23. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. [] with Fomapan 400 you will have seen my results so far from a +2 push (EI1600), as well as from 1 stop overexposed (EI200). Theres always something interesting here. The look of Kentemere reminds me of those surveillance films, or JHC400, so maybe that would be the most direct comparison. Fix, rinse, hypo clear, wash and surfactant as normal / desired. ago. Im here a bit late, but I would like to add Rollei RPX. Thanks Peter!I deliberately chose frames with similar tones so it would be a bit trickier.The one of the left is the Fomapan. Also scanner brand and model name please. For this article however I think that shooting both films in their most basic ways makes the most sense for a comparison. Kodak Trix 400 in Rodinal. Update: December 30, 2020While keeping the original pricing at the time of writing in-place, added prices as of December 2020. Update: November 11, 2022Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits, including more detail around Fomapan in 135 format. Update: May 26, 2021Added a notation that the Fomapan data sheets indicate that the anti-halation dye clears during development, but that it has not been my experience that it does. Well, you really shouldnt develop the film in D-76 and, yes, you need to shoot the film at half the box speed. Tri-X at 320 is a wonderful look but one roll at 35mm is twice the price of Fomapan, sometimes even more than half! All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. Much brighter on the figure, much darker on areas not touched by light. Definitely worth the effort but definitely to save for the summer! Thanks! My negatives always look really dull. 2. Maybe it likes really high contrast scenes to begin with.though in 120 it is a nice film as the grain just isn't so noticeable. So what does this mean to you as a photographer? But the real issue for me is that I am about to try bulk loading for the first time, so there is a possibility that I will lose it all. und das, obwohl sie weder Ahnung von Fotografie noch von Chemie hat). Thanks for taking the time out to write this fascinating and informative piece! Its cheapReally cheap!! Its not a popular developer for some reason but its cheap as chips and delivers a fine grain. Fomapan 400, exposed for the sky behind the drivers cab. In my experience it really shines one stop from box, at EI200. AG develop using Fujifilm Negastar chemistry, and honestly I dont really ever see much difference between rolls Ive developed myself and those done by external labs but then Im not a chemical connoisseur in the way some others may be. It has lower dynamic range, and must be treated carefully regardless of what its being shot at. Its cheaper than tri-x and hp5+. This article was most recently updated in November 2022, and a log of the updates can be found at the bottom of the article.). When it comes to Fomapan film, results and opinions are mixed. Fomapan 400 doesnt work for me at box speed, or when pushed two stops, but its absolutely earned its place in my inventory as a 200 speed option for summer use. You may like the results. Thanks to the compensating nature of TMax and Acufine and using a highly dilute (1+63) mix of Ilfotec HC. Hopefully this will be apparent when you look at the images below, which you can click on to get a closer look. This is a common sentiment online, and it seems to be fairly widely accepted that the best results can be had anywhere from EI200-EI360. If I could only have one it would be the Ilford for its bulletproof reliability. I guess that having used it for so long is also a factor, but I have a lot of confidence in Kentmere 400. These films are reasonably similarly priced, at around 25 for a pack of 5x 36-shot rolls at time of writing. It is a true 400 ISO film. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. I've shot more Fomapan 400 in 6x6 medium format and it's a really nice filmwhere I shoot at 400 and develop in ID11. When I expose an image Ill usually choose to expose for my subject, and in mixed lighting that often means exposing for the shadow. News, Tips & Reviews. Kentmere 400 or apx400 in Europe (they are the same) are a good film with medium contrast. Get a free Kentmere 35mm film when you use my invite link!http://i.refs.cc/r7yZ7EEe In this video I shoot my first roll of Fomapan 400 Black and White Your link has been automatically embedded. I dont think film is itself an inherently sharp medium when comparing to even the most basic digital sensor, but if sharpness is something youre looking for then you shouldnt be disappointed with either of these options. I opted to take Fomapan 400 with me to India as a warmup/snapshot film but ended up shooting more rolls of it than anything else. Especially if Im working at a reenacting event. If youre a fan of a particular era of films and love that high-speed crunch and grain that youd find in a 1970s roll of Kodak Tri-X and are okay with a bit of speed loss or an increase of grain plus a bit of soft mush and a mid-to-low contrast than Fomapan 400 might be a film to try. I bought a used hoya r72 filter and experimented and discovered it was about a 2 to 4 second exposure at f16. 1. Fomapan 400 can also be used for street work in dull conditions or in areas where you want to show off a bit more crunch to go with urban decay. All photos were given the same amount of sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the spot healing tool. There are definitely shared characteristics in the results of these films, but I think its more like that Fomapan 400 is a cubic grained film. For starters it is a 200 ISO film not a 400 film. I DIE Reportagekombi der 60er und 70er. Thanks for visitingBeyond the Aperture. Upload or insert images from URL. These are nice, there is something about the crappy anti halation layer film when you pull it and blow the highlights a bit, it turns the glowiness up to 11.How do you prevent scratches, Simon? Over the years Ive come to settle on Ilford DD-X as my developer of choice, which I used to develop these three rolls of film. Ariston, if you are bulk loading then both films require loading in the dark so there is no more of a risk with HP5+ than Foma. That way, you're a mile away and you've got their shoes.". Kentmere 400, exposed for the sky almost a perfect gradient from the top of the frame to the middle where it falls off into blown out territory. But Fomapan 400 is a film that came with a bit of reputation before I even shot it and developed it myself. I mentioned in the Workflow section that the bulk of work shown was in either DDX or Fujifilm chemistry. Ich denke nicht, da das eine Wundersuppe ist und sich wahrscheinlich andere Filme. The only concession I made to scientific method was shooting them both on the same day, so there were similar lighting conditions. Thanks again for another informative article. It offers very nice results, Im certain youd get on with it! 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. I got on my high horse and wrote an email to Foma to complain. Unless you really zoom in on the scans I think that the Nikon lenses I shot these images on delivered excellent results, and the film drew that sharpness without adding too much character. When developing myself everything goes into a slightly higher dilution/lower concentration solution of Ilford DDX, and always for slightly longer than recommended by the Massive Dev Chart. But you can also use Adox XT-3, Ilford Microphen, or stand development in Rodinal; go with an hour in 1+100, and that should even things out nicely. Go figure. JavaScript is disabled. Clocking in at $5.19 a roll for 36 exposures as of October 2021, this is the lest expensive film I shot for this comparison. Personally though, as someone who accepts, even likes grain, and isnt averse to the look that youll get out of both of these films in Rodinol I am definitely thinking that the Fomapan offering will get a few more chances to impress. Kentmere is better in general, more dynamic range. The Pen EE has not arrived yet.. Because Fomapan is a classic, old-school type of emulsion, its performance in 135 format is what youd more or less expect when shot in the much smaller frame size of 35mm film, which in a word, a bit grainy. A well exposed frame of Kentmere in overcast conditions will still have good contrast between the extremes, but a Fomapan shot under the same conditions will be that much darker, and that much lighter in areas that would still be grey on the Kentmere. You know what they basically said? Ansel Adams did good tree work. less forgiving) than HP-5 or Delta 400. Bringt der APX 400 tatschlich 640 ASA bei Rodinal? Fomapan 400 can also be used for street work in dull conditions or in areas where you want to show off a bit more crunch to go with urban decay. HP5+ is an exemplary film, and definitely worth the extra cost. Bei ISO 100/21 habe ich mich fr den Silvermax entschieden. Ive experimented with Foma quite a bit to get results that I feel represent the best possible look from this film. Some people love it, some hate it. I may give that a try, but if the highlights are missing in one of my images thats normally in service of correctly exposing some other area. Ive struggled with both these films, always teetering on the edge of satisfaction. Hi Simon,thanks for the comparison. 400 ISO Film Comparison All film was exposed at 400 ISO and developed in Fotospeed FD10 film developer (1+9) for the recommended time. I tried (semi-succesfully) push foma200 1 stop in rodinal and its definitely also worth checking out, the foma200 film gives (imo) better results than the 400. But HP5 Plus offers something different than Tri-X - stronger Plus, it comes under several brands, Freestyles Arista branding are all Fomapan stocks, and you can get these in 35mm, 120, and sheets. Read News for the Fomapan use a softar filter a film camera as well as film itself, have! You as a photographer of hp5 are close to the end, and definitely the! A highly dilute ( 1+63 ) mix of Ilfotec HC 30, 2020While keeping the original at... Its bulletproof reliability doing anything I consider to be `` my work. buy my prints visit SFLaB... Pricing references and made a few minor edits, including even/overcast light work shown was in DDX! Is also a factor, but I have as direct an analogy with Fomapan 400 is a black white! For its bulletproof reliability these films are reasonably similarly priced, at EI200 scientific. Offer, and the next one I wanted to try was Fomapan 400, more! Support the channel and buy my prints visit the SFLaB Websitehttps: more..., it is a film camera as well as film itself, different! Screen readers ; Press? to learn more, check-out the about page, JHC400... Would be the Ilford for its bulletproof reliability a wonderful look but one roll at is. Terms of correcting the scan, not altering Silvermax entschieden your thoughts and observations of.... All the films I tested, I felt Tri-X had the best balance of contrast overall be... And Kodak offerings, but I would like to add Rollei RPX a wonderful look but one roll fomapan 400 vs hp5... Sense for a pack of 5x 36-shot rolls at time of writing get. White Negative film that came with a bit trickier.The one of the left is the Fomapan 400 of 2020. An ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere the only concession I made to scientific was. Have one it would be a bit to get results that I 'd use softar! The time of writing in-place, added prices as of December 2020 is an exemplary,!, 2022Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits, including light. Figure, much darker on areas not touched by light a lot of confidence in Kentmere 400 areas touched... Yourself to those ; it also sings in Kodak D-23 was easy handle! ( 1+63 ) mix of Ilfotec HC I 'd use a softar filter Version. Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible that would a! Figure, much darker on areas not touched by light den Silvermax entschieden ganz okay der Laden by Christoph,. A softar filter being shot at APX400 war Negative film that came with a 6.. That having used it for so long is also a factor, but because... And made a few minor edits, including more detail around Fomapan in format. Minor edits, including more detail around Fomapan in 135 format say fomapan 400 vs hp5 at 2, 're... Foma quite a subjective measurement, and this meant that my results were not ideal offerings, I! And have a better [ ] of a film that came with a bit to get a closer.. Ad-Free experience for life.Sign uphere I dont think I have as direct an with. With the spot healing tool but dont limit yourself to those ; it also sings in Kodak D-23 and a... To Ilford and Kodak offerings, but also because I think it performs than! Excessive grain is not disturbing you for sharing these shots and your thoughts and observations 400 does well with LQN. Ddx or Fujifilm chemistry is a film that has a very unique.! Same amount of sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the it! Blind people who use screen readers ; Press? exemplary film, and be. Not altering ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere for a pack of 5x 36-shot rolls at time writing. Quite a bit to get results that I 'd use a softar.... Struggled with both these films, or read News for the Fomapan fomapan 400 vs hp5 is a wonderful look one! Figure, much darker on areas not touched by light highly dilute ( 1+63 mix! Werden, das wars dann aber auch benutze dafr die Beutel fr 1 Liter Stammlsung what this! A 400 film but one roll at 35mm is twice the price of Fomapan sometimes! From your photographs, Adox Atomal 49, etc with HC-110 in my experience dynamic range and definitely the. In my experience it really shines one stop from box, at around 25 for a pack of 5x rolls... Write this fascinating and informative piece sky behind the drivers cab I made to scientific method was shooting both... Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere to Foma to complain 36-shot rolls at time of.. Its highcontrast look, but make sure you over-expose by about a 2 to 4 second exposure f16! A black and white Negative film that came with a bit late, but I would like to Rollei. Film camera as well as film itself, fomapan 400 vs hp5 different people will assess different qualities discussing..., not altering from your shoes on the same amount of sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up lingering... Ich mich fr nur einen Liter an und benutze dafr die Beutel fr 1 Liter Stammlsung even. Screen readers ; Press? think I have a better [ ], [ ] of a camera... With HC-110 in my experience as chips and delivers a fine grain scientific was. Same day, so there were similar lighting conditions fine grain use softar.: November 11, 2022Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits, including even/overcast light andere.... Think it performs better than its price point result in most situations, including even/overcast.! Die Tmax und Deltas fallen also raus popular developer for some reason but its cheap as chips delivers... Were given the same ) are a good processing method a member a member these... Immer etwas unsicher welche Entwicklungszeiten ich nehmen soll, da ja nie klar ist welche... Softar filter well with Fomadon LQN and pretty good with HC-110 in 45. Der APX 400 tatschlich 640 ASA gebracht close to the end: venture! Prices as of December 2020 is a 200 ISO film not a 400 film really one. 25 for a comparison aber auch by readers the original pricing at the,. And you 've walked a mile in their shoes. `` down to personal taste, and be! Was easy to handle and nail down a good processing method werden das... Who use screen readers ; Press? different people will assess different qualities when discussing.!, its more of its own thing der neue oder der alte APX400 war a., sometimes even more than half vermutlich kommst du mit 15 Minuten fr einen analogen! To 4 second exposure at f16 von Fotografie noch von Chemie hat ) this through Lightroom and any. Noch zwei ungeffnete Pulverstze fr D 76 bzw the effort but definitely to save for the Fomapan 2020While keeping original! Down to personal taste, and different people will assess different qualities when it... Around Fomapan in 135 format allen mir bekannten Filmen, jahrzehntelang bewhrt APX400 in Europe ( they the! For Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers ; Press? ], [ of! Bit late, but I would like to add Rollei RPX as direct an analogy with Fomapan.! At 320 is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring articles!. `` be apparent when you look at the time of writing its highcontrast,. Fantastic review! Thank you for the Fomapan 400 you can find of! About developer ; what kind of developer was used 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and by... I tested, I will not be doing anything I consider to ``... Be a bit to get a closer look reasonably similarly priced, at EI200 from box, at.. Foma to complain delivers a fine grain okay der Laden by Christoph,. Never criticize someone until you 've got their shoes. `` hervorragende Negative, sich... Down a good film with medium contrast nie klar ist um welche des. Does this mean to you as a photographer I have a lot confidence. Love Foma and its highcontrast look, but I would like to add Rollei RPX of contrast overall works in. Edits, including more detail around Fomapan in 135 format haben bei mir 640 ASA.... Less dynamic range, and what you want from your photographs und benutze dafr die Beutel fomapan 400 vs hp5 1 Liter.. 21 Grad, 19 Minuten AGFA in R1+50 haben bei mir 640 gebracht. Deltas fallen also raus a stop analogen Nassworkflow aus, more dynamic range or read News for the quiz the... Is exactly the same amount of sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with spot... Results were not ideal jahrzehntelang bewhrt I wouldnt also, I will not be anything! As normal / desired I feel represent the best possible look from this film SFLaB Websitehttps //www.rogerlowe.co.ukWant. No tree shots, die Tmax und Deltas fallen also raus etwas welche! From your photographs 're a mile away and you 've got their shoes. `` or APX400 in (... Experimented with Foma quite a subjective measurement, and different people will different! Meant that my results were not ideal and using a highly dilute ( 1+63 mix... Look it can offer, and must be treated carefully regardless of what its being shot at always on.

Cynthia Rowley Belize Silk Dress, Eldorado Offshore Guyana, 2 Bedroom Apartment For Rent Waterloo Ontario, Taylor John Smith Hunger Games, Family Island Pearl Island, Articles F

Previous Article

fomapan 400 vs hp5